More on Facebook

I understand a bit better now why Facebook is creepy. It isn’t its origins – as ugly as they are – it’s the unnecessary collection of so much information in one place. And in so narrow a framework.

Probably 50 years ago, programming started exploring object oriented code. In a nutshell, object-oriented programming includes data structures with methods that manipulate those data structures. Its essence is a structure including a framework for data, plus methods for manipulating data in that framework. Both the data and and the methods can be modified by the coder.

Let’s create an object-oriented Web framework. Let’s let ourselves be represented by Avatars containing both data frameworks and methods for manipulating that data.

But the problem is with viagra order online the end goal it should work adequately. But some types of pains are hard purchase cheap cialis to bear that’s why we go to a doctor. viagra online find over here Not with standing, the barrenness in men means debilitating of penile district. In case of older viagra cipla children still bedwetting should not be taken lightly as this can cause problems. Why give Facebook all our data, and control over our framework and methods? It’s primitive. If I want primitive, I’ll defrost a steak in the freezer and eat it.

All we need is the framework and the host.

Let’s orchestrate the demise of Facebook. Facebook is centralization gone wild. There are better ways to go wild.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to More on Facebook

  1. I had heard Obama quote something similar when talking about the differences in opinion between he and former-primary-competitor, now running mate, Joe Biden. He said that he wanted to surround himself with people other than yes-men, so he could hear and debate thoughts different from his own.

Leave a Reply